Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Yes he does. Negative value means that the Flames would need to take an underachieving player at a high salary in return (Neal for Lucic for example). No team is giving up picks or prospects for Monahan or he wouldn't be a Flame today.
|
Agree to disagree then.
I think the Flames were looking for non-injured Monahan value and didn't get it.
If they wanted a quality player or a first it wasn't happening. But that doesn't mean you have to take a bad player/contract to move a 20 goal scorer with one year left.
You take less ... say a third, or you retain and get a second.