Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Wow, that's quite a take.
Sloane clearly stated that she was editorializing and that these were her opinions alone. She expressed them clearly, thoughtfully, and eloquently. Why is her opinion invalid, simply because she is a hockey analyst and not a political reporter (or whatever)?
How about we evaluate her comments based on their content? I personally agreed with her.
|
Hockey analyst, a little bit of a stretch. Host for segments nobody watches, sure.
What about her arguments did you agree with? The NHL hasn’t done enough? Some issues, yes, some, no (purely based on nothing data driven). What exactly has she said that others haven’t said? Why doesn’t she talk about her terribly biased tweet? Let’s talk about some known facts the past couple years. Women not being involved at the nhl level? How about skating coaches being hired, Wickenheiser hired in player development, AHL trying out female refs. What more does she want in a short period of time?