Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus
Sounds like sour grapes to me. Fox is a great player at both ends and certainly doesn't need to be as good defensively as Makar or Heiskenan to be worth the investment, but he probably is better than both based on what I've seen out of all three.
|
Sour grapes? Nah. I rarely give any thought about the Fox stuff and when I do I think that Calgary did better with that level of pick than teams normally do even considering he forced a trade. In fact, I took Fox in my pool so I'm generally happy he does well.
I haven't seen enough of Heiskenan to comment - I just love Makar's play, more than Fox's. It's that simple. Makar just seems to control play up and down the ice a lot more. Like I say, it's all eye test and just a lay opinion.