Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
What a pointless post.
I said a rumour is factual if a deal is being discussed. You just repeated the same thing back after earlier saying a deal has to come to fruition for a rumour to be factual. Which is it?
And I never said the Eichel stuff was a factual rumour, but Eichel doesn't have to end up in Calgary for it to be a fact that the two teams have been talking.
Plus I'd give some rumours more credit based on the frequency and the sources, two things that I believe we see in the Eichel discussions.
Add in the fact that Treliving is in on everything and it becomes less of a threshold to be a factual rumour.
Are you really suggesting the two teams aren't talking? Talk about a salmon and upstream.
|
Are we playing fast and loose with the word fact?
Isn’t that a rumour and a hyperbolic one at that?