Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
How did you arrive at that conclusion? We know that Cheveldayoff was present at the meeting, but the extent of his involvement remains really unclear. His later denials about being aware of the situation sound extremely hollow now, and I think he is rightly being criticised for being in a position to take some sort of action—any action, and doing nothing. He may not have been as actively involved as figures like Bowman, Quenneville and McDonough, but I think it is a mistake to absolve him completely based on the little bit that we know right now.
|
Yeah he was involved. According to the report his version was pretty different than the others in the room, which is not a strong point in his favour.