Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger
Not gonna lie, I didn’t get much from that article. He seems upset that Villeneuve didn’t add enough “new” stuff or capture the unfilmable heady aspects of the novel.
In fact, can’t really understand what he’s saying. It’s paragraph after paragraph but he doesn’t actually say what he doesn’t like or what he would have preferred instead.
It wasn’t weird enough I guess?
|
Strange, this article is very much like Villeneuve's Dune. It's a series of concepts but no real creative ideas.
It's the same difficulty I had explaining my objection to the style and content of the film, while I do respect the film making.
The movie is beautiful, unfortunately it's just a Ghoula without a soul.