Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
If the Flames are looking to move a d-man who isn’t playing up to his contract, Andersson fits the bill more than Hanafin.
|
Possibly. Although Andersson is by default, the more important offensive defenseman due in part to his slot on the #1 PP unit.
Either way, I’m not advocating trading Hanifin right now. To me, it’s more so about, if this team is in a cap bind next offseason and they absolutely had to make a move, then it’s Hanifin instead of Tkachuk.
I think a lot of people are misconstruing the original point/reply I was making. I'm not trading Hanifin just to trade Hanifin. I’m choosing to keep Matthew Tkachuk over a Hanifin or a Coleman and I think 90% of posters here would say much the same.