I distinctly recall hearing /reading her intention to call a 'climate emergency' but I never really understood (nor did she expand on) what that would actually mean or accomplish.
At this point, it really just sounds like using the context of a climate emergency as a key guiding principle for all decisions the city makes. Projects should have consideration for climate change impact / mitigation, etc., which I frankly would be shocked if they didn't already. Perhaps this just ensures that the scope for such considerations is expanded and made mandatory for anything proposed moving forward.
__________________
-James
GO FLAMES GO.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
|
|