Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald
He may have reported what the grant was written for and was unaware of any variance. There is a reporting process for tracking of spending for grants, but final reports are not submitted until the grant cycle is closed out. So he may have not been aware of the variance in application of the funding, and the variance may not have been discovered until the grant cycle was complete. Again, both can be true.
|
Oh please.
He was aware. Especially at the time when he was asked 'on the record' which was long after the rumbling started that there had been funding to begin with.
Money doesn't go to China to fund lab research, and when said lab has an outbreak that leads to a world pandemic that kills millions of people, you completely forget that you funded them to begin with and call it an oversight.
If he wasn't aware, he should be fired for gross incompetence.
There were concerns for many years in regards to the exact research that was being done. The same concerns are with the lab in Winnipeg, and the fact that the government is completely trying to bury what happened there.