Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Otto
Explain the idea it was put in place FOR the benefit of the police. I think it was put in place FOR the benefit of the victim (which is very common) and 24 years down the road, we look back and it clearly did benefit Chu. There's a difference though.
Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk
|
It is clearly for the benefit of Chu, the accused in this case. How is it not? My understanding that the victim was fighting to get the word out. Perhaps I am mistaken in that notion, but if true, how is it helping her?
I guess we'll see what comes of this not that the ban has been lifted. More investigative journalism is needed.