Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie
I'm not deep in the weeds on this one, but there is lots of wiggle room between properly following protocols and whether said protocols are actually any good or not.
|
Well I'm not saying that Chu shouldn't have been formally charged or whatever, but there was a post saying that there were no longer any records because of the 2013 flood. I would expect that the current Chief of Police would speak to that, and not say he reviewed the records if that was the case?
I'm pretty cynical, but even I can't think that that Chief of Police would lie about that at this point.