Quote:
Originally Posted by Kipper_3434
Fans here are crazy at relating to context:
Poster 1: Talbot put up better numbers in his career and cost less than markstrom.
Poster 2: you are ignoring CONTEXT! Markstrom put up slightly above average save % in one season where Vancouver allowed tons of low quality shots from outside. Vancouver = no good therefore Markstrom = good. Also if you exclude Markstrom's bad games you are left with only his good games. Which means Markstrom is ELITE (but only if u smrt and can do maths)
Me to myself: didn't Talbot play most of his career as a starter in Edmonton?..yeah that Edmonton...swarm defence, "this guy scored"...
|
The people saying Markstrom is not elite outnumber the people saying he is elite by about 10-0.
"Markstrom is elite" is not an argument actually being made by anyone.