Quote:
Originally Posted by VilleN
I understand that to some degree. If this team was finishing the way it is supposed to, Markstrom's name isn't mentioned. To me Markstrom not being a Kipper level goalie right now is secondary. Based on shots, possession etc. we should have won that game. Really it shouldn't have been close. The only reason Markstrom is a topic of discussion is because we can't score. 4 goals on nearly 100 shots is horrific.
|
4 goals scored on 90 shots isn't going to cut it. 7 goals against on 59 shots isn't so great either.
There is plenty of blame I guess but let's give it more than two games to see where these numbers go.