Quote:
Originally Posted by VilleN
I understand that to some degree. If this team was finishing the way it is supposed to, Markstrom's name isn't mentioned. To me Markstrom not being a Kipper level goalie right now is secondary. Based on shots, possession etc. we should have won that game. Really it shouldn't have been close. The only reason Markstrom is a topic of discussion is because we can't score. 4 goals on nearly 100 shots is horrific.
|
Yeah the “second best goalie” on the ice complaint is pretty convenient. What about our dominant but rarely scary offence?
The culmination makes us 0-2