View Single Post
Old 10-19-2021, 07:09 AM   #280
SeeGeeWhy
#1 Goaltender
 
SeeGeeWhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post

Those in the O&G field would probably know better, but I wonder what happens to these plans once the inevitable oversupply happens. If the best cure for for high energy prices is high energy prices, then surely a supply glut of in the forecast. Europe made strong climate goals when energy costs were low, and are now looking at even stronger goals when process go higher. Could that change if prices go low again?
Institutional and major fund investors are really starting to demand ESG plans that include emission reduction plans, fossil fuel development has fewer dollars chasing it.

Frankly, I think commodity price volatility is more a sign of the struggle producers are having to maintain high enough costs to keep producing. We’d need solid $120/bbl and/or much higher carbon prices to keep the marginal barrel producing with carbon capture. There is a reason more investment is funnelling into producing “blue hydrogen” than unconventional plays or war spoil barrels (the marginal barrel).

You’re seeing that people can’t afford higher energy costs. When they can’t pay the Piper, the Piper stops playing.

We are in serious trouble and risk severe contractions if people don’t get their head out of their ass about fission.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
If the NHL ever needs an enema, Edmonton is where they'll insert it.
SeeGeeWhy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SeeGeeWhy For This Useful Post: