Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
I disagree actually, I was all for an Equalization review, but the wording of it making it seem like it was going to be eliminated? Thats a hard 'No.'
Realistically Equalization isnt going anywhere, nor should it. But can it be more equitable? Or fairer? Maybe.
But complete elimination? That is so preposterous as to be laughable.
|
It’s not actually proposing an end to equalization, just removing the section mentioning it from the Constitution. Equalization payments existed before that was in the Constitution, and it could exist after as well.
Just to highlight the meaninglessness of the exercise further.