Unless I'm mistaken, the rule has always been no goal if there is a "distinct kicking motion". I can believe it if the NHL has tried to narrow what that actually is (which is too bad because it introduces too much discretion IMO -- a kick is a kick), but seeing the Jets goal, the Mangiapane no goal, and last night's goal -- I think it's too much of a grey area.
Either they're all no goals (which I'd be fine with), or they clarify in the rules that there is a difference between redirecting a shot/pass off your foot, and directing a loose puck in the crease into the net with your foot. The "distinct kicking motion" language isn't good enough.
|