Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
This film doesn't sound like much more than a glorified paparazzi piece on a celebrity. Who really doesn't have more to worry about?
|
How do you figure, if Moore in fact did get to speak to Roger Smith and then lied (imagine that ) in his film that Smith refused to talk to him, it destroys the whole premise of that film. Its hardly a paparazzi piece where they're making things up.
we know that Moore is incredibly dishonest and very smart about his editing in his fillms, and it follows a trend that show that his films are a good collection of fiction with a few facts thrown in supported by lies and fiction.
Its hardly a paparrazi piece since it dosen't allude to Moore having relations with Elvis. It could be considered a journalism piece if its blowing the roof off of Moore's industry and exposing a film maker that himself is no better then the Paparrazi.
Good for these two kids.