Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit
I've never liked her, and yeah in this case she was one of the main voices against Flouride. It was her motion that got it removed in the first place. She even voted against this plebiscite, so not only is she against it, she's against us deciding for ourselves
|
I heard her on Eyeopener one morning and she explained her reason for the fluoride removal decision and it made some sense that this was supposed to be in conjunction with other measures but none of those were ever done and the only thing that happened was fluoride was removed. Maybe somebody can elaborate more on the other things that were supposed to be done.