Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_MacDonald
Fially, I think the producers should chose their "experts" a little more carefully. Many of the people interviewed in this production have some serious skeletons in their closets, whether it be working for the wrong people, having your qualifications questioned or revoked, taking money from special interest to build a case, or just plain doing faulty work. Here's some links to those in the production that I found intersting.
Professor Tim Ball Dept. Climatology University of Winnipeg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_F._Ball
http://www.desmogblog.com/node/1272
The shadiest of characters and habitual liar, has received funding from less than neutral interests.
Professor John Christy Lead Author IPCC
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=John_R._Christy
Professor Phillip Stott Dept of Biogeography University of London
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Philip_Stott
Received huge funding from big oil interests.
Professor Paul Reiter IPCC & Pasteur Institute, Paris
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Reiter
Hes an entomologist, not a climatologist.
Professor Richard Lindzen IPCC & MIT
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Richard_S._Lindzen
Received huge funding from big oil interests and is a Cato Fellow.
Patrick Moore Greenpeace
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Moore_%28environmentalist%29
Dr. Roy Spencer Weather Satellite Team Leader NASA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Spencer
Professor Patrick Michaels Dept. of Environmental SciencesUniversity of Virginia
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Patrick_J._Michaels
Received huge funding from coal and energy interests and is a Cato Fellow.
Professor Ian Clark Dept. Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Clark
Professor Fredrick Singer, Former Director US National Weather Service
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=S._Fred_Singer
Is a Cato Fellow and many of the bodies he is affiliated with receives huge dollars from ExxonMobil in support.
|
Ah the Ole Lanny ad hominem attack.
Any affiliation with big oil will discount any facts of figures or thoughts you may have. As we know big oil his all hell bent on the distruction of the earth. No one in big oil would ever choose this option;
Produce oil in a way that is enviromentally sound.
Nope. Nada. NOT.
Only rational enviromentalists please. i.e. Only those that adhere to dogma!
YOU ARE DOOMED!!!