Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain
https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-goalten...ed/c-297375900
Not according to the NHL rulebook.
(d) The standard for overturning the call in the event of a "NO GOAL" call on the ice is that the NHL Situation Room (which shall include a former referee in the Officiating Department in the decision-making process), after reviewing any and all available replays and consulting with the Referee who made the original call, determines that the goal on the ice should have been allowed because either: (i) there was no actual contact of any kind initiated by the attacking Player with the goalkeeper; or (ii) the attacking Player was pushed, shoved or fouled by a defending Player causing the attacking Player to come into contact with the goalkeeper; or (iii) the attacking Player's positioning within the crease did not impair the goalkeeper's ability to defend his goal and, in fact, had no discernible impact on the play.
|
Your argument is that he was fouled.
Mine is that, after driving the net, and falling as a result of Tanev's defending, he slid into the goalie.
No penalty was called.
He was not pushed, shoved or fouled by a defending player. He slid into the goalie.