Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
Don't know much about the decision or the applicable law, but I'm assuming this verdict requires a finding that Jones doesn't genuinely believe anything he is saying on the subject? That's probably correct.
|
Nope. It's a default judgment. It doesn't require any finding at all. Jones was in default of his obligations to comply with procedural steps in the litigation so he just automatically loses. No issues need to be determined. You lose. Good day sir.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|