Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Feaster’s “law background” is 2 years right after law school doing leases for various venues owned by Hershey Entertainment and Resorts from 1988-90. After that he never practiced at all.
And I’ve shown and so have other actual practicing lawyers, that not only is there a huge doubt that Feaster had it wrong. BTW, it doesn’t matter in civil law whether Feaster’s (ex post facto) interpretation was “reasonable”. That’s not the standard.
You know who is an actual licenced lawyer? Bill Daly.
|
If you truly think O Reilly actually would have hit waivers I don't know what to say except it is laughable. More than likely the contract would have been voided, it would have been a bad look for the NHL as well if a team lost its 1st for a badly worded clause in the CBA. It never would have come to that. Again, zero chance. What do you mean that is not the standard? If the law has no clear interpretation there is no standard.