Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
He wouldn't. Feaster used his law background to see how poorly worded that was. No chance in hell he was going on waivers.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
That is fine but in a legal battle Feaster would have won. The wording absolutely left the interpretation reasonable that Feaster took. At worst a judge would have just voided the contract and everything would go back to before he signed the offer sheet. There is no chance we would have lost him on waivers, none.
|
Feaster’s “law background” is 2 years right after law school doing leases for various venues owned by Hershey Entertainment and Resorts from 1988-90. After that he never practiced at all.
And I’ve shown and so have other actual practicing lawyers, that not only is there a huge doubt that Feaster had it wrong. BTW, it doesn’t matter in civil law whether Feaster’s (ex post facto) interpretation was “reasonable”. That’s not the standard.
You know who is an actual licenced lawyer? Bill Daly.