Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebot
So you are saying Russia is not trustworthy, ok. The media did not report that the event actual happened, ok. Anything else to add captain obvious? You are so busy with your circular argument about trust that you are missing the point that their claim may still be legitimate even if you don't like them. You seem to be nitpicking on the who and using solely that to justify dismissing the claim entirely.
I posted about the allegation that has been reported on by multiple media sources, which I believe has likely happened. You started arguing about its legitimacy, which is fine, but in reality you seem to be more debating the fact that I believe it to be true and attacking that.
Your whole argument attempt seems to be what exactly? That the Russians aren't trustworthy and as such it shouldn't be posted or assumed to be true?
|
I specifically said it might be true.
The point was "wait and see" and that you were being silly for arguing with people who suggested they would "wait and see," given the conditions that made it completely reasonable to "wait and see."
But please continue waving your arms around, taking things personally, and talking about random things like "Ghani is American! Did you know! Someone was strangled with their own scarf!" whenever anyone engages with you. It's insane, but I'm here for it.