Quote:
Originally Posted by neo45
Doesn’t that make it sort of a lose lose? He plays like he has been he isn’t worth the money if he takes a big step forward under Sutter you immediately have to pay him more
|
I think it’s done to mitigate the risk. There is always more risk signing a defensive defenseman to a long-term deal… I know it’s working out with tanev but it’s smart to keep flexibility.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk