View Single Post
Old 08-20-2021, 10:30 AM   #54
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
And all of those contracts are also very bad.

Anyway the one-year aspect of it is fine. It's just too much money for one year and an indictment of the Flames' decision to trade for this player in the first place. Just a pretty bad bet to acquire a low-upside player with a low-upside contract.

I’m hoping the intangibles help like when Engelland was paid an amount people didn’t understand
DeluxeMoustache is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post: