Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
I mean if you want to play stupid semantic games just to avoid answering the question, suit yourself.
Yes, they can "not accept" and the consequences are that they starve, go homeless, etc. Under those circumstances, would you still consider someone agreeing to work for low wages as consensual?
|
You're trying to expand the definition of "consensual" in a way that strips the word of utility, and yet you accuse me of playing semantic games?
The alternative to not accepting an employment offer is not simply starvation, it is the ability to find a better employment offer. In fact, that's an alternative even if they do accept the employment offer. It is a person's right to seek the maximum amount of money for their labour.