Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
If your claim is that there is no reliable data, or that there “aren’t any data,” then you can meet the threshold by proving your credentials that allow you to make those claims with any notion of authority whatsoever.
So buck up or shut up. Let’s see your credentials. I seem to be able to find data that you say doesn’t exist and I seem to be able to track results from studies that seem less “all over the place” and more practical and expected given the nature, location, and variables of the studies. But you’re telling me what I’m seeing is wrong or isn’t reliable, so show your credentials.
Put them up, and I’ll take what you say as an expert opinion.
|
I'm not offering an expert opinion. I'm saying that the experts don't agree.
Look, I am already late to pick up my wife from work, but here is one of the first results produced by a quick search:
Quote:
|
The hope, Jere McBride, PhD, director of the experimental pathology graduate program at the University of Texas Medical Branch, tells Verywell, is that the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines will confer immunity for two to three years. In reality, however, the duration “could be longer or shorter” and will only be determined by conducting studies of people who have received the vaccine.
|
In other words, Dr. McBride confesses that there is no data and the duration of immunity is a WAG.
If you bug me about it later, I may come up with enough similar reports to make you sick and tired of me – or I may just ignore you, because I am getting sick and tired of you.