Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Yeah, Tanev's numbers are all over the place, so you have to ask what is changing (lots of things) and what might be causing such significant variances.
On the other hand, Nurse's numbers are very consistent from year to year and throughout the 3 years. So there is certainly more reason to think the evidence is telling you something.
|
Well the stat is either a reliable way to measure individual contribution or it isn't.
Maybe Tanev is an extreme outlier and the stat is reliable? If Tanev's situation is the norm however I would suggest that this stat isn't a great measure of individual ability.
If that is the case, I personally wouldn't use it as a standalone stat to determine competence.