Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random
Most of the jobs I've ever had no longer exist. Many of them didn't exist yet when I first entered the workforce. Economic and technological changes happen.
But here we aren't talking about a guy who lost his job because a bunch of hockey teams went out of business, or because goalie coaches suddenly became obsolete. He lost his job for a reason that had nothing to do with his performance, nothing to do with any of his actions in the workplace, nothing to do with his employer's on-the-job requirements, and everything to do with appeasing a Twitter mob.
If you are incapable of seeing the difference, I guess we have nothing to discuss.
|
I'm pretty confident that MLSE includes as a requirement for every high profile position in its organization that employees not publicly say or do things which harm the reputation and brand of MLSE. Maybe a requirement to generally show good judgment as well? Seems perfectly reasonable to me.
In fact, there's a pretty compelling argument that MLSE was stupid (and failed to fulfill its duty to its shareholders) by hiring Imoo in the first place. Failing to terminate him in the face of clear damage to the organization would be an even worse dereliction of duty