Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgaryborn
It isn't the percentage. It's the argument. I will not surrender my
right to look at the material on both sides and come to my own conclusions. Scientists are just as fallible as the rest of us. They are
also just as prone to herd mentality and corruption as you or
me.
If the global warming camp were more willing to acknowledge other
significant factors and give an honest attempt to measure their effect
instead of ringing alarm bells and dismissing opposing views as fringe
science I would be more inclined to wards them. "Everyone worthwhile agrees with me" is not an convincing argument in my eyes. Also, Al Gore as a spokesman doesn't help the readability of their case.
|
You're using circular logic. If scientits study something and find concerns, how do they tell people without as you said "ringing alarm bells"? Not ring them? That would be useful...
You keep mentioning Al Gore, what are your specific disputes you have with his claims? Other than him being; as I suspect is your issue, a Democrat (ex).