Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Well, that depends on whether you define 'depth guy' by where he played (3rd line), or how he played (top 6 productivity).
For me, how a person plays defines what they are.
The Flames had Ritchie on the top line for a while - that didn't make him a top 6 guy, he was still a depth player.
|
This would have been a good response to start
My original point was I am wary of Stanley cup “depth” (your comments are noted) in that a guy playing behind what is likely great players can change how the perform. Hard to expect the same in an elevated role.
Now saying that, back in my first post, I don’t think the money or term are all that bad. Cap goes up in 2-3 years.