View Single Post
Old 03-06-2007, 02:58 PM   #270
calculoso
Franchise Player
 
calculoso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flame On View Post
As if the "other side" hasn't had a fair shake thus far and the poor non environmentalists have been drowned out!
So, those "non-environment" (as you call them) that are dismissed as "in bed with the Energy Giants" are getting a fair shake?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flame On View Post
I don't mind dispute and counter claims, but I guess I'm saying those that are over eager to listen to them are the ones burying their heads.
And those that are over eager to dismiss them?

I found this particular article interesting because it echoed my questioning of the graphs that Hulkrogan posted a while back. In particular, it appeared that there were multiple times where CO2 and temperature moved independently. This article articulates and details two of these instances.

There may still be a valid explanation to explain these and maintain the CO2-temperature relationship, but it is definitely something that needs to be answered... not summarily dismissed.
calculoso is offline   Reply With Quote