Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Step right up Marc Bergevin!
It was still a bad contract. He might have been bought out regardless.
Still doesn't make sense to me why they didn't just terminate it for violation of the morality clause a la Richards. They'd probably have to settle it but settling by definition means it's less than what you have to pay otherwise.
I doubt his buyout hurts them much cap-wise though. Maybe a few hundred K this year and next?
|
Nothing has been proven in court so how could they terminate his contract as part of a morality clause?