Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
Garland is going to demand 5+ years. He's also undersized and streaky. If he doesn't live up to his contract, this has the potential to cripple the Nucks. This is insanely risky IMO. I mean this could work out....but it also could leave Vancouver with $12+ million in dead cap for many years to come.
|
Yeah, I think Garland is a piece that a team thinking they are about to contend adds. A younger Kessel, or Pageau.