Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
Garland is going to demand 5+ years. He's also undersized and streaky. If he doesn't live up to his contract, this has the potential to cripple the Nucks. This is insanely risky IMO. I mean this could work out....but it also could leave Vancouver with $12+ million in dead cap for many years to come.
|
I have never wanted Lanny_McDonald to be right so much as I do with regards to his assessment of Garland.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
|