View Single Post
Old 07-21-2021, 12:04 PM   #145
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus View Post
Including the trade deadline months ago, Tre could have made a deal at any point to get something in return for Gio (even if it required some salary retention). Many teams would have treated him as a pure rental only to expose him the same way the Flames did.

This GM is just a complete lame duck at this point and the Flames are in big trouble with pizza boy at the helm for another year.
I guess he probably could have gotten "something" for him. But you need to make sure the "something" is worth losing another player in addition.

Would you rather lose Gio for nothing, or lose Gio and Kylington for a 3rd?
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post: