Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
You believe based on? Have you seen any of these systems navigate city streets?
|
Based on what I've seen and read. I for opinions the same way most people do. You seem flabbergasted that I've come to different conclusions than you,despite others in the industry comnig to similar conclusions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
Hype has zero to do with the actual technology don't know why you brought this up except I guess Tesla "hype" bothers you.
Get around the limitations how? How can more sensors enable handling of complex driving situations?
|
The same way we do. Having 2 eyes is better than one, because you get depth perception. Adding ears is better than not, because you take in audio cues. Even your nose kicks in occasionally, to get out from behind a dirty diesel. It's baffling to think that more sensors are worse.
I understand the issues with sensor confusion, but if you get that with 3 sensors when one is wrong, how to you get around it when one sensor is wrong, and it's all you have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
As I said time will tell.
I do find it comical that Waymo and Nvidia are leading FSD. How? Waymo is an on the rails system it may was well be a roller coaster.
|
I'm not sure what you mean by"on rail" system. From everything I have seen, it navigates similarly to Teslas. I know they need more work done mapping the back end, so it can't currently be placed anywhere(I don'[t think) but it's not just following one road.