Quote:
Originally Posted by 868904
The numbers thrown around for Landeskog make me wonder why there is so much consternation about Tkachuk’s next contract.
Assuming he wants to stay, $9 million per year for 5 or 6 years is not a bad deal if you are getting the prime years of his career.
It’s certainly better than 7 years x $7 or $8 million per year for Landeskog where the back half of that contract he will be underperforming the contract.
|
IMO Tkachuk is better than any of these players so if the prices we are seeing for Hyman and Landeskog come to fruition then maybe we have to accept that Tkachuk's going to be a $9 million player.