Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck
The Nets analogy is meant to highlight how hamstrung the franchise was without picks while the experiment did not go as well as expected, not the age of the players in question.
Acquiring a 22 year old elite player for 4x 1st's, with I would say equal risk of this team being a lottery contender vs a playoff team, is foolhardy. Especially with the status of our prospect pipeline. It would be ludicrous asset management.
|
As long as the AAV is below 10.276M it's only 2 firsts, 1 second, and 1 third. So obviously you keep the offers below that. Sad to think that compensation is barely more than Treliving paid for Hamonic...