Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary
its the equivalent of a rorschach test.
You can choose to believe the veracity of the eyewitnesses, who now include trained observers and not 'just some dude', who generally know what they are seeing, or write them off as crackpots or opportunists.
The Tic Tac incident wasn't just Fravor (who was the commander of the squadron on that carrier) but his wingman and their two additional pilots.
What it was, was unknown phenomena, but if the data is correct, pretty tough to explain what it is.
If are are 'defying' the Laws of Physics as we understand them, then the list of explanations gets small pretty fast. If it is Russian or Chinese technology, I'd be more worried frankly, than an paranormal explanation...
|
I saw David Copperfied defy physics once by making the Statue of Liberty disappear. Turns out he wasn't really defying physics, but how could all those witnesses be wrong? It was also caught on radar and video.
Creating technology that can defy the laws of physics - pretty damn hard probably.
Creating technology that can fool people and instruments - probably a lot easier and within the realm of human capabilities.