Regarding the physical object hypothesis that it's U.S. or Chinese, is there evidence readily available to make that kind of confident assertion? It would stand to reason that statement would need as much proof as it being anything else. Physical objects can be fired into the sky from a number of things, including asteroids, volcanoes, objects lighter than air, and space junk. Addtionally, we don't even know if they're physical - they could be meta-material if Lue Elizondo's rather specific assertions about extra or multi-dimensional phenomena holds any weight. We just don't know.
The only thing that could remotely emulate any of those observations from a human level would be private-sector black projects in which there is little coordination with military allies on such tests. Ben Rich, former director at Skunk Works and the primary player in the development of the F-117 Nighthawk, had on numerous occasions during his life made statements about hypersonic, anti-gravity crafts that they built, and crafts that "they" (as in others) built and Skunk Works harvested for big leaps in technology. Whether any of that is true or not is probably buried deep in legal, bureaucratic and dark money projects that will never see the light of day.
I personally believe admitting UAP's are real and even calling out the social stigma, while implementing official protocols to report such encounters is a huge narrative change from the previously tabooed subject that could end careers in an instant. Congress getting briefed on UAP's and their national security threats, while coming to the same conclusions at the 9/11 Commission Report (as in, they should be sharing reports and not siloing for a more complete and sophisticated analysis approach).
Hell, even right in the report they say "Although there was wide variability in the reports and the dataset is currently too limited to allow for detailed trend or pattern analysis, there was some clustering of UAP observations regarding shape, size, and, particularly, propulsion." The fact they even said the word "propulsion" is pretty astounding in itself, as in there are things performing aerial maneuvers with no obvious propulsion method.
I am admittingly very interested in the UAP and have been for a while - but this isn't some nothing burger. This is a pretty significant moment in lending credibility to the topic.
|