View Single Post
Old 06-25-2021, 03:05 PM   #229
Since1984
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Tighter strike zones sounds like a good idea - more offense - but I think in reality, it would be a terrible idea.

A smaller strike zone means more balls, more walks, starters not lasting as long, more bullpen pitchers, and more time waiting for pitching changes.

In other words, a game that already goes north of 3 hours most days, and north of 4 hours fairly often, would actually slow down and play significantly longer.

No thank you.
I think the biggest thing isn't to squeeze the strike zone, it is to standardize by introducing robo-umps that only ever call strikes that catch any part of the plate from right at the base of the kneecap to right below the chest. Have your sensors in place and have a consistent strike zone every game for every player.

I don't know what it is but the umpires have been atrocious this year when calling strikes and balls.
Since1984 is online now   Reply With Quote