Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
You are basing as truthful facts an article you have read.
Yes, you need to wait for the proper process to play out.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
|
No I didn't. I specifically said if the story was corroborated by the independent witness.
The guy was a rapist we know that. It's not up for debate.
Now two players have come forward and said he raped them. Another person was alleged to have been told about what happened and told Bowman to go to the police and he said no. If that guy said that's what happened, what more "proof" do you need? How many victims and witnesses before you believe that maybe the rapist did rape someone?
Again, this isn't criminal. This is about some sleazy executive covering up rape for PR purposes. It happened all the time with people turning a blind eye. Did we forget about the #MeToo movement so fast?
And if the independent witness says "I never told Bowman to go to the police" then you continue the investigation. But two rape victims, apparently multiple witnesses all collaborated with the same story about someone already convicted of rape...if it quacks.
Like you guys understand people get fired all the time for he-said, she-said, type situations that never see court, or even could if the allegations are true, right? If I use racist language in a meeting with three other people and all three go to HR and say I did it, I've lost my job without a trial and if I get two weeks severance, there's pretty much nothing I can do.