Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
You led off with it. It kind of calls into question your assumptions. With Lucic waiving, why would you not protect Backlund? And why would you hope he gets claimed?
|
Gives Seattle options to mull over and allows the flames to protect another young player in Phillips. Personally I think Lucic means more to this teams identity than Backlund as does Gio so honestly of the 3 I’d like to see Backlund gone which is why I lead with that. If Backlund isn’t exposed I don’t see the logic, it’s a contract that will only get uglier but I can see your reasoning with Lucic already being asked to waive his NMC with intention of exposure.