Quote:
Originally Posted by timun
 You very heavily implied that it's solely due to PP time.
You are very selectively picking and choosing the most flattering stats you possibly can to paint Mangiapane in an over-flatteringly good light. Not to say he's bad, not to say he doesn't have the potential to be better, but you don't hand out big-money contracts to forwards with a career high 32 points in a season: that's is absolutely complete and utter ****ing LUNACY. |
Umm no you assumed that. If you read my original post I very clearly say “prolific special teams production” in regards to Marchand and actually don’t mention PP anywhere in regards to him, I specifically called it special teams which encompasses PP and PK.
Plus how did I selectively pick any stats here? Please explain what stats I refrained from showing.
I showed NHL total goals, total points, points per game, 5v5 goals, 5v5 points, 5v5 points per game, 5v5 goals per 60, 5v5 points per 60, 5v5 primary points per 60, Corsi %, and xGF%. Plus AHL goals, points, and points per game.
Sorry for not specifically splitting out PP and PK stats I guess...thought showing 14 different stats would have been good enough.
But sure other people keep throwing around “30 point player” without any weighting for games played, but me who actually went and pulled 14 different stats to compare the two players is “cherry picking”
Also in 13-14 Marchand had 53 points in 82 games. Mangiapanes 82 game pace is 47 points, it’s not fair to say it’s 32 points because he didn’t control Covid shortening the season.
$5.7 x 47/53 = $5.05M. That’s your own math so you shouldn’t get mad at that logic. And around $5M is exactly what I’ve said is fair the whole time.