Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
Thanks for the link
I think the strongest arguements they make are the epidemiological ones. Essentially for 3 lab techs to go to hospital means hundreds of community cases which the serology doesn’t back and that the way the virus broke out of seeing a few unconnected cases followed by the main jump is consistent with natural evolution
I think they fail to discuss the gain of function experiments as a cause and instead focus on debunking the actively engineered theory but otherwise a really good rebuttal of most of the arguments.
|
Except the 3 lab cases tested negative for SARS COV2 antibodies in March/April. And if you needed 100's positives in the community to get three people seeking care, one would assume you would've also needed 100's of other lab researchers that were positive before there were 3 seeking care too, no?
Again, in order for it to be gain of function they would have had to have this complete virus minus a few changes. And it would've been super easy to say "we found the original virus" in whatever coven they found the one they did gain of function in.