Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
I'm all for an honest debate about Treliving and I'm one who thinks he should be let go, based mainly of a lack of results, and not particular errors (though there are two major ones I believe he made).
What I do that casts me as some sort of defender is that I dislike incorrect arguments or false narratives. this isn't, as someone suggested, just because I like to argue. It's more that, if you are replacing a guy you should at least be honest about why you are doing so, or else you are going to get the same result next time.
|
Agreed. I think results and the finished product are both still a big question marks for this team. It is not that I don't think Brad is able, but I do believe inexperience has played a role in the team spinning it's tires at various times. The ability to get a quality on ice product while keeping up with other NHL teams seems to be lacking. We appear to be falling behind in the race while other teams are getting stronger. I am hoping if Treliving does stay that, he and Darryl come up with a clear direction that can get this ship focused in the right direction, If they can't we might be heading for another rebuild due to a weakened roster.