Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz
I also think that a lot of the alleged Treliving apologists are critiquing these get-fixed-quick solutions that CP posters are suggesting. They aren't necessarily defending Treliving's performance as GM.
They aren't evaluating Treliving's performance in a vacuum. There are other things to consider, like whether other GMs are even available. Or the value of continuity in the GM position. Or the suggestion that Treliving, as a younger GM, might improve and learn from his mistakes.
Others CP are simply acting as devil's advocates. Either way, I guess it can make for good discussion.
|
I'm all for an honest debate about Treliving and I'm one who thinks he should be let go, based mainly of a lack of results, and not particular errors (though there are two major ones I believe he made).
What I do that casts me as some sort of defender is that I dislike incorrect arguments or false narratives. this isn't, as someone suggested, just because I like to argue. It's more that, if you are replacing a guy you should at least be honest about why you are doing so, or else you are going to get the same result next time.